It was later of year 1907, that Rudolf Steiner’s disturbingly
pro-Christian bias began to truly come to the fore, coupled with increasingly
open disparagement of H.P. Blavatsky. He stated that there are two methods or
paths of initiation available nowadays for spiritual aspirants in the West.
What are they? Who has made them available?
Steiner explained that:
« The Master Jesus and the Master Christian
Rosenkreuz have prepared two ways of initiation for us, i.e., the Christian
esoteric way and the Christian Rosicrucian way. Both ways have been in
existence since the Middle Ages. However, as materialism grew, the spiritual
life disappeared more and more from the consciousness of humanity. At the end
of the last century materialism had advanced so much that humanity would have
perished if it had not received a new spiritual impulse. Only one person could
be found whose psychic faculties enabled her to hear the voice of the Masters.
This was H.P. Blavatsky. »
So he is speaking highly of HPB
after all…or is he?
No, sadly not, for he follows this with the barefaced lie – completely
unproven and unprovable by anyone or anything except his own prejudiced
imagination and psychic fantasies – that HPB’s true intended work and mission
had been “in the sense of Christian Esotericism, as had been her purpose.”
Such a revelation will astound anyone even remotely familiar with the
life, work, and teachings of HPB. Not a single page or paragraph in the story
of her life will lend support to Steiner’s claims. Yet what has been said,
written, and recorded, by many others, including HPB herself, counted for
nothing with Steiner, for he believed his own clairvoyant perceptions and readings
of the “Akashic Records” to be infallible enough to give him the “true” story
of things, regardless of how wildly it might differ from all known facts and
inescapable evidence.
HPB failed in her Christian mission, he tells us, but at first she did faithfully
serve:
« The Occidental Orders” of Initiates, for whom
“binding Blavatsky’s properties direct to the essence of Anglo Saxondom became
the object to be attained. … At first matters proceeded as planned, so to say.
Indeed, Blavatsky began to acquaint herself with the spiritual life of Central
Europe. »
He is referring to her travels in Europe and particularly her visit to
Paris in the early 1870s, prior to moving to live in the USA.
All known sources say that she hardly left her room in Paris during the
three months she was there and occupied herself mainly with painting and
waiting to receive further orders and directions from her Indian Guru, the
Master Morya, as to where and when she was to go next. Eventually, as all know,
the order came to set sail for New York.
Steiner tells us quite a different story of what was going on during her
time in Paris. Over the course of several lectures from 1916, a few years after
the Anthroposophical Society was established, he asserted that in Europe HPB
worked under very competent leadership for some time and made a good degree of
inner progress so that her Western esoteric overseers arranged for her to join
a certain Christian Order in Paris. Due to being too demanding and laying down
too many inconvenient conditions, she was eventually denied membership and then
moved to the USA.
In America, according to Steiner, “she was actually admitted in an
occult fraternity and as a result she obtained considerable insight into the
objects which such occult fraternities pursue, and also into those which on no
account strive for the welfare of humanity. She communicated with American
spiritualists who wanted to do away with the teaching of reincarnation. Mediumship
was the means to attain this. Such a field of activity was not in Blavatsky’s
nature. Therefore she was expelled from this fraternity, the reason given
being: An attack on the constitution.”
Again, in 1907, two years before he parted company with the Theosophists
and while still a leading figure in the Theosophical Society’s Esoteric Section
or School in Europe, Steiner’s attitude towards HPB and the Mahatmas was
becoming increasingly negative.
Steiner claimed that when HPB began the Society, it was a distinctly
Christian Esoteric effort. “In the time that H.P. Blavatsky wrote Isis
Unveiled she was inspired by Rosicrucians,” he said:
« Subsequently Madame Blavatsky became detached
from this source of inspiration and was drawn into the sphere of influence of
an eastern-oriented form of theosophy. This gave rise to The Secret Doctrine,
which contains great truths of a non-Christian character, but great nonsense
where the Christian religion is concerned. »
Writing to Edouard Schure, he says that:
« The Society’s first foundation had a pronounced
occidental character, and also the book Isis Unveiled, in which H.P.
Blavatsky revealed a large number of truths, had such a western character.
. . .
The verities in question have been inspired by the great initiates of
the West, who are also known as the initiators of the Rosicrucian wisdom.
The distortion mentioned before is caused by the way in which these truths were
absorbed by H.P. Blavatsky’s soul. For the educated portion of the world this
very fact should have formed the proof that the sources which inspired these
truths were of an elevated nature. For never could anyone of himself come to possess
these truths which she represented in such a poor manner. »
HPB’s “occidental initiators,” as he calls them, were supposedly
disappointed with HPB’s poor quality of writing and inability to clearly
express their teachings.
« When they realised how few possibilities this
gave them to infuse a stream of spiritual wisdom into humanity, they decided to
drop their efforts along these lines. However, the door had been opened,
and Blavatsky’s soul had been prepared in such a way that it could absorb spiritual
truths. Consequently eastern initiates were in a position to get hold of her.
At first these eastern initiates’ intentions were beneficial. They saw
how the imaginative faculty of humanity was running the risk of being
materialised completely by Anglo-Americanism. They – these oriental initiators
– wanted to infuse into the Western world their form of a spiritual
knowledge that had been guarded for centuries on end.
Under the influence of this tendency the ‘Theosophical Society’ got an
oriental character, and the same influence inspired Sinnett’s Esoteric
Buddhism and Blavatsky’s The Secret Doctrine. However, both works
are distortions of the Truth. In Sinnett’s work the valuable statements it
contains are distorted by his immature philosophical intellectualism. The
contents of The Secret Doctrine are distorted by Blavatsky’s own chaotic
soul. »
But these Rudolf Steiner’s asseverations are false because, Master
Kuthumi wrote about Sinnett's book:
« Be certain, that with
a few undetectable mistakes and omissions notwithstanding, your "Esoteric Buddhism" is the only
right exposition — however incomplete — of our Occult doctrines. »
(CM 82, p.392)
And Master Kuthumi wrote about Blavatsky's book:
« This work has more value than its predecessor [Isis Unveiled] being The Secret Doctrine an epitome of the hidden truths that will make it a source
of information and instruction for the serious student for many years to
come. »
(Letters from the Masters of Wisdom, First Series, No. 19, p.55)
Not content with these deceptive slurs, Steiner added, at a meeting of
the Esoteric School in Munich on 1st June 1907, that the knowledge of the
Eastern Initiates was “in a rigid, petrified form, without any signs of life.”
HPB, he says, wrote “Isis Unveiled”
with the aim of presenting esoteric philosophy from a “Central European”
perspective, which he declares to be an evident fact for anyone who will read
the book, despite it having been written “in a kaleidoscopic, almost useless
way.” Her beneficent “guide” “wanted to lead her further on the Central
European way” but “she soon came under altogether different influences when she
fell into the hands of other individuals.”
He states
« These were the Oriental brotherhoods. When H.P.
Blavatsky had written her Isis Unveiled, these brotherhoods claimed that
it was their wisdom, for many of the symbols and doctrines mentioned were known
to them and they searched for means to frustrate her as much as possible. Thus
it was extremely hard for her to carry out her work in the sense of Christian
Esotericism, as had been her purpose.
In this period life was indeed exceedingly difficult for her. The occult
fraternities in question pressed her forward to such an extent that she was
obliged to clothe her second work, The Secret Doctrine, in an Eastern
garment. Even now we are accustomed to use Oriental names for most of the
concepts embodied in the occult doctrines. Nevertheless, this Eastern form of
truth does not at all suit our Western peoples. It can only slow us down and
lead us away from our goal. »
Several years later, he informed the Anthroposophists regarding HPB
that:
« Her first work, Isis Unveiled, shows us
the entirely chaotic, illogical, passionate and contradictory character of her
being, but also the fact that the powers behind her were working in a generally
human sense.
The Secret Doctrine reveals not only the understandable
human interest in special subjects, but also an interest originating from
certain occult centres who are not working in a generally human way, but have a
particular goal in view, want something specific.
Tibetan, Indian, but also the
Egyptian initiation of the moment only want to take revenge on the Western
world because of the suppression of Eastern occultism. They wish to revenge the
fact that the Western world – due to materialism – has triumphed over the
Eastern world. »
Let us put all these assertions into an orderly fashion so we can see
exactly what Steiner is saying.
First, he tells us that:
- HPB’s true
and original mission was to further and promote the cause of Christian
Esotericism.
- Her
preparatory training and initiation for this task was in the West and primarily
in Central Europe.
- Her guides
and inspirers were Western Initiates, including Rosicrucians.
- The
Theosophical Society was founded by her and Col. Olcott in 1875 (he fails to
mention William Judge) with a distinctly Western emphasis and character and for
beneficent Western occult purposes.
- Her first
book “Isis Unveiled,” published in 1877, also had a distinctly Western emphasis
and character and was inspired by “the great initiates of the West.”
These inspiring powers were working in a human way.
He then tells us what happened next:
- These
Western Initiates were disappointed with her poor quality of writing and
inability to clearly express their teachings and thus decided to give up these
efforts.
- But as her
soul had already been prepared and opened up for such a type of work, she
became the target of Eastern Initiates, for whom she was effectively an easy
prey. They wanted to use her to promulgate their “rigid” and “petrified”
knowledge and defeat her Christian aims.
- They began
by claiming that the knowledge in “Isis Unveiled” was their own and sought to
frustrate her in her true mission. She was unable to resist their overpowering
influence.
- These
Eastern inspirers were working in a non-human way and with the hidden
aim of taking revenge on the Western world for it having triumphed over the
Eastern world.
Any Theosophist worthy of the name
will know that this is all a complete pack of lies.
What makes it the more puzzling is the obvious fact that any of
Steiner’s listeners and readers could easily and immediately disprove such
notions just by reading “Isis Unveiled” for themselves, which would swiftly
show them that things were the very opposite of what he was saying. The very
first line in the preface of the book says:
« The work now submitted to public judgment is the
fruit of a somewhat intimate acquaintance with Eastern adepts and study of
their science. »
On the next page she says that :
« It was while most anxious to solve these
perplexing problems [i.e. about
spiritual matters] that we came
into contact with certain men, endowed with such mysterious powers and such
profound knowledge that we may truly designate them as the sages of the Orient.
To their instruction we lent a ready ear. »
The book, particularly its second volume, is largely a powerful critique
and exposé of the Christian religion whilst at the same time being a promotion
of Indian and other Oriental philosophical ideas and teachings, so that at the
end of the second volume the summary begins with the words “the reader must
keep in mind the fundamental propositions of the Oriental philosophy which we
have successively elucidated.”
What then was Steiner talking about?
He had read these words for himself, perhaps many times. One can only
assume that he was either extremely and conveniently forgetful or that he was
deliberately and consciously deceitful. Whatever the case may have been, he can
hardly be viewed in a decent or trustworthy light. Why did no-one challenge him
about this?
Again, one can only assume that his many admirers either chose to
conveniently forget and overlook what they themselves had read in “Isis
Unveiled” or that they had never read the book and never bothered to read it
after hearing his potent yet fallacious critiques.
Any decent biography of HPB will show even more just how astoundingly
false and impossible are Steiner’s claims about her life, work, and
inspiration. We obviously cannot go into great detail in an article such as
this but can recommend in particular the book “HPB: The Extraordinary Life and Influence of Helena Blavatsky” by
Sylvia Cranston, which is the lengthiest, most extensive, most well researched
and referenced, and truly inspiring biography available of HPB.
Suffice it to say briefly here that her mission and work was from the
very first an Eastern-inspired and Eastern-themed one; that the most important
part of her training, instruction, and preparation for her world mission was in
the East, partly in India but particularly in Tibet and the Trans-Himalayan
regions; that from even before the Theosophical Society was founded her Adept
Guardians identified themselves as Buddhists; and that both before and during
the time of the writing of “Isis Unveiled”
she described herself to friends, including in an extant letter to American
Platonist Dr Alexander Wilder, as being herself “a Tibetan Buddhist” of the esoteric
kind.
In addition, his Masters of the East were also personally seen by
Colonel Olcott, William Judge and other members of the Theosophical Society,
and even much earlier, as was the case with Blavatsky's aunt, who related that
when Blavatsky’s members family were very worried because they had no news of
she, an oriental man appeared to inform her that Blavatsky was well and that
soon she would return and then he disappeared in front of her.
(And her narrative can be read here.)
CONCLUSION
This is one more example of the lies
that Rudolf Steiner invented, but if this falsehood reveals a profound
dishonesty, his lies about Master Kuthumi are worst (see link).
(Fuente:
https://blavatskytheosophy.com/rudolf-steiners-lies-about-h-p-blavatsky-and-the-mahatmas/)
